1 Comment
User's avatar
David Phillips's avatar

The example of creating a faux John Steinbeck book from a synthesis of his writings, one by a human and one by AI, seems to suggest that they should or would be treated differently. I'm also picking up a suggestion that AI could do it better. Are derivative TV shows, movies, book, artwork okay merely by virtue of being created (entirely?) by a human? What are the bounds of "inspired by" versus plagiarism, are are those different for human vs AI? Tis a puzzlement.

Expand full comment